Let's have your opinions then cos I honestly don't know whether the Pop Paedo will get off the hook or be put away for good ... how can the jury be impartial after all the media revelations over the years? How do we know it's not just evil mothers using their sons to get millions out of him by forcing them to lie? How do we know if he's a really dangerous paedo who hides behind his fame and fortune to abuse young boys?
from what I've heard the evidence points to the latter - he says he "loves children" but you never see him with young girls, it's always been young boys. When they grow up and their voices crack and they are no longer tiny and cute, he drops them like a stone ... he openly admits to sharing a bed with a child and thinks nothing of sharing a bed with children he is not related to - fair enough if your son is feeling ill and you snuggle up in bed with him, but if your neighbour's son was feeling ill would you crawl into bed with him too?!?!
There was a British lad on GMTV this morning who had been outside the trial with his placards and protests, and who thought Jacko was innocent. When asked "is it normal for a grown man to want to share his bed with dozens of non-related young boys?" his pathetic answer was "well it's not normal for a 5-year old to be performing on worldwide TV but that's what Michael did" - er great argument!!!!
If he is convicted what then - you can hardly throw him in a normal US jail - he will be isolated and mollycoddled and have a special team to look after him at a cost of millions to the taxpayer. I say throw him in a cell with a fat guy called Bubba who REALLY likes little boys, then give him a taste of his own medicine.
If he's not convicted what then - will his circle of little boy friends continue, and will we sit back and watch and allow it to continue? Will more boys start coming forward with "he touched me here" stories, wanting $$$$ payouts? can you arrest a man AGAIN for a crime that he was aquitted of?
Jacko's recent "back trouble" stories just as the jury start to deliberate are pathetic. Is a little back problem or illness going to sway the jury??? It sure wouldn't if he were Ted Bundy ... "oh he's got a bad back let's let him go, poor lamb!" And no medical problems in the world should not sway their decisionmaking when it comes to Jacko either.
No comments:
Post a Comment